University rankings: what’s the point?

University rankings are widespread and commonly referred to: ‘So-and-so University is the best in the country’, or ‘The University of Such-and-such is in the top 10 in the world’, or ‘Blah-de-Blah university is rubbish, it’s lower down the tables’. But do rankings – university ‘league tables’ – really tell you if a university is good, and if it’s better than another one? Do they tell you what you think they do (or what they claim to)?

Rankings are supposed to inform the outside world – students (and/or their parents) and funders – where they should best spend their time and/or money (provided they have a choice). They may also let employers to know where the best graduates are. All of those groups can then choose where they study, where to commission research, or where to recruit from. At the same time, universities can see where their weaknesses are in relation to their competition and take measures to improve. So you get transparency and choice, with competition driving up quality. Brilliant, everyone wins. Or do they?

There are two big issues around rankings: the criteria they’re based on and the nature of the competition itself. I’ll have a look at these in two blogs, Measures and Markets.


About ddubdrahcir

A Higher Educationalist...
This entry was posted in Rankings. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to University rankings: what’s the point?

  1. Pingback: Are universities ‘dumbing down’? | Stuff About Unis

  2. Pingback: Who gets hurt the most by BrHExit – Brexit and Higher Education? | Stuff About Unis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s